Search for: All records

We investigate the impact of low-rank interference on the problem of distinguishing between two seabed types using ambient sound as an acoustic source. The resulting frequency-domain snapshots follow a zero-mean, circularly-symmetric Gaussian distribution, where each seabed type has a unique covariance matrix. Detecting changes in the seabed type across distinct spatial locations can be formulated as a two-sample hypothesis test for equality of covariance, for which Box's M-test is the classical solution. Interference sources such as passing ships result in additive noise with a low-rank covariance that can reduce the performance of hypothesis testing. We first present a method to construct a worst-case interference field, making hypothesis testing as difficult as possible. We then provide an alternating optimization procedure to recover the interference-free covariance matrix. Experiments on synthetic data show that the optimized interferer can greatly reduce hypothesis testing performance, while our recovery method perfectly eliminates this interference for a sufficiently small interference rank. On real data from the New England Shelf Break Acoustics experiment, we show that our approach successfully mitigates interference, allowing for accurate hypothesis testing and improving bottom loss estimation. 

This article presents a theoretical analysis of optimally distinguishing among environmental parameters from ocean ambient sound. Recent approaches to this problem either focus on parameter estimation or attempt to classify the environment into one of many known types through machine learning. This classification problem is framed as one of hypothesis testing on the received ambient sound snapshots. The resulting test depends on the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) between the distributions corresponding to different environments or sediment types. Analysis of the KLD shows the dependence on the signal-to-noise ratio, the underlying signal subspace, and the distribution of eigenvalues of the respective covariance matrices. This analysis provides insights into both when and why successful hypothesis testing is possible. Experiments demonstrate that our analysis provides insight as to why certain environmental parameters are more difficult to distinguish than others. Experiments on sediment types from the Naval Oceanographic Office Bottom Sediment type database show that certain types are indistinguishable for a given array configuration. Further, the KLD can be used to provide a quantitative alternative to examining bottom loss curves to predict array processing performance.